Page 31 - Healthcare News Mar/Apr 2021
P. 31

   IF YOU’RE A HEALTHCARE PRACTICE FACING A SINGLE AUDIT, YOU OUGHT TO CALL JIM KRUPIENSKI.
 Many healthcare practices are now fifinding themselves subject to their fifirst governmental Single Audit. Jim Krupienski can walk you through the process and ensure you are in compliance.
Learn more at:
     413-536-8510 | mbkcpa.com
 MARCH/APRIL 2021 WWW.HEALTHCARENEWS.COM 31
   HEALTHY OUTLOOK
Provider Relief Funds
These Lifelines Come with Reporting and Compliance Guidelines
 BAy JAMES T. KRUPIENSKI, CPA
t the start of the COVID pan- demic in the early parts of 2020, the concern of business survival
was the number-one thought of countless businesses, with each industry having its own struggles.
The medical industry was not without its own real concerns at that time, particularly given its role in the pandemic fight. People would continue to get sick, require treat- ment, and see their physicians, but how could it be done safely?
Recognizing the financial crisis that was about to overtake this industry, along with how detrimental it was for the industry to remain open and accessible to patients, the federal government took dramatic steps. In addition to Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, for which medical practices were eligible, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act also allocated funds directly to the medical industry through the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the newly created Provider Relief Fund (PRF).
The first round of funding, which was completely unexpected to many, occurred in early April 2020, when $30 billion was deposited directly into the accounts of eligible practices. Throughout 2020, addi- tional funds were later rolled out in phases 2 and 3, as well as through targeted distri- butions to specific industries, such as rural providers and skilled-nursing facilities. Im- portantly, for all practices receiving these funds, several rules need to be followed.
While the COVID-19 relief provisions, as part of the CARES Act, provided a lifeline for many medical, dental, and other healthcare-related practices during the pan- demic, that support was not without certain compliance requirements and reporting, which we will dive into within this article.
Attestations
First, within 90 days of receipt of the funds, each provider was required to attest to certain terms of use. For those electing to return the funds, it was required to be done within 14 days of this attestation. Attesta- tions were required for receipt of funds
in all phases and were to be completed through the use of a portal with the HHS. This portal can be located at www.hhs.gov/ coronavirus/cares-act-provider-relief-fund/ for-providers/index.html#how-to-attest.
“If you report on the use of
a personnel- or payroll- related expense, it cannot also be tied to dollars used
in applying for PPP loan forgiveness. Essentially, a practice cannot ‘double dip.’”
pliance requirements. If a practice has re- ceived combined federal awards though the Provider Relief Fund in excess of $750,000, a single audit will be required.
While the majority of relief programs un- der the CARES Act (such as the Paycheck Protection Program) are subject to report- ing requirements, the PRF has its own distinct rules to navigate. If your healthcare practice took advantage of the PRF in any amount, it is highly encouraged that you speak with an advisor as soon as possible to fully understand the compliance require- ments. Navigating federal compliance can be intimidating and confusing, especially
if this is your first time doing so. Speaking with an advisor can demystify this process and help ensure that you understand the regulations. v
James T. Krupienski, CPA is a partner at the Holyoke-based accounting firm Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C.; (413) 536-8510.
 Reporting
As part of the attestation process, any provider receiving more than $10,000 in payments through the PRF would be re- quired to report on use of the funds. While the specifics on the exact reporting are not yet finalized and continue to be reworked by the HHS, the general guidelines are known. Barring no future changes, PRF dollars are to be applied in this order: certain qualifying expenses that can be directly attributable to coronavirus, then lost revenues.
Of greatest importance is the under- standing that the use of these funds must be kept separate and distinct from the use of other coronavirus relief aid. For example,
if you report on the use of a personnel- or payroll-related expense, it cannot also be tied to dollars used in applying for PPP loan forgiveness. Essentially, a practice can- not ‘double dip.’
Initially, reporting was set to begin back in the summer of 2020, which was then pushed to the fall of 2020 and then again to Jan. 15, 2021. However, because of updated legislation and a change in administration, reporting has been delayed even further.
At this time, no date is available for when the reporting portal will be open, with some suggesting it could be late 2021. For all recipients of the fund, it is important
to continue to monitor this status so that
a reporting deadline is not missed. To stay on top of this process, the HHS has been updating their site with current regula- tions at the following link: www.hhs.gov/ coronavirus/cares-act-provider-relief-fund/ reporting-auditing/index.html.
Audit Requirement
One stipulation, not known to many, is that a government single audit is required if the combined federal funds (PRF and other
federal assistance) received were more than $750,000. Please note, PPP funding does not count toward this total.
A single audit would be required of an organization that has $750,000 or more
in federal awards. While federal funding
is typically awarded to not-for-profits and governmental organizations, the HHS PRF has opened many organizations, including for-profit medical practices, to these com-
 



























































   29   30   31   32   33